SPONSORS

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Lt. Col. Andrew Horne Reporting For Duty

While I realize John Y Brown III posted about this already this morning, I wanted to jump in and say how glad I am that we have a formal top-tier candidate -- Lt. Col. Andrew Horne (D) -- to take on President Bush's waterboy and the leader of the party that got us in the unimaginable debacle of the Iraq War -- Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R).

While there is still another month or so before the filing deadline, I believe this is Horne's primary race to lose. I don't say that with any contempt for the other possible candidates who are considering a run, like Attorney General Stumbo (D) or even businessman Greg Fischer (D) -- but I believe Lt. Col. Horne matches-up well with McConnell, particularly on the most important issue of the day -- the war. While McConnell can lecture us about his bird's eye view of the situation in Iraq and then puts soldiers in his campaign ads, Horne is a real soldier who actually led Marine combat forces during this very war. And with one race under his belt (the 2006 Third Congressional District congressional primary), he will no doubt be a stronger, smarter, savvier opponent, as is usually the case with talented candidates the second time around.

Most here know that I supported current U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth (D) last year against Horne. I supported John because I knew he would become the very rockstar congressman he now is. But once the primary was over, there were few stronger advocates for him than Andrew Horne, who campaigned his heart out to help John win the general election. My opposition to Horne was nothing more than my passionate support of Yarmuth. It was only after that November election that I got a chance to know Andrew on a personal level. He's a rock-solid person, has a remarkable story to tell -- and has been doing so this past year on behalf of VoteVets.org -- and Kentucky would be well-served with Lt. Col. Horne reporting for duty in the United States Senate on its behalf.

So, I'm very happy Lt. Col. Horne has volunteered to serve us once again and I look forward to a spirited primary campaign and a general election ass-kicking of the highest order of the man who has offered us these incomprehensible bits of wisdom:

  • “I’ve never met a finer man than our governor, Ernie Fletcher,” said McConnell. “I’m proud of Ernie Fletcher. I’m proud of Glenna Fletcher. And I’m proud of the image they present for our state.” (link)

  • Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell of Kentucky called Bush "one of the great presidents in the history of the United States." (link)

  • Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said the war in Iraq has been an "extremely successful undertaking." (link)

  • Senator Mitch McConnell called Rumsfeld “a spectacular secretary of defense, one of the best in American history." (link)

Don't you think Kentucky deserves someone with better judgment to serve them in the U.S. Senate?

Me too.

http://andrewhorne.org/

Contribute_button_mainpiece

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

McConnell Continues To Write Lit Pieces Against Himself Each Day

Let's add the latest offensive statement to the heap that Senator McConnell (R) has offered us over the past few years:

“It’s obvious he’s not ahead at this point,” McConnell said. “I think the governor can still win this race. He’s done an excellent job.”

Here are other "lit pieces" he's kindly written for us to use against him next year:

“I’ve never met a finer man than our governor, Ernie Fletcher,” said McConnell. “I’m proud of Ernie Fletcher. I’m proud of Glenna Fletcher. And I’m proud of the image they present for our state.”

               

Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell of Kentucky called Bush "one of the great presidents in the history of the United States." (link)

            

Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said the war in Iraq has been an "extremely successful undertaking." (link)

         

Senator Mitch McConnell called Rumsfeld “a spectacular secretary of defense, one of the best in American history." (link)

Simply incomprehensible stuff.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Is McConnell Losing Control of His Caucus?

Is this the beginning of a break in Republican unity under Senator McConnell's (R) leadership?

...a few Republican Senators are considering breaking ranks with their leadership and supporting Jim Webb's troop-readiness bill, which would give troops as much time off as they spend in the war -- a measure that would slow the war down in a big way.

The source tells us that three Republicans who voted against the measure last time are now considering backing it: Senators George Voinovich, Lisa Murkowski, and Elizabeth Dole. This is significant, cause it could push the number of total "yeas" towards the magic filibuster-proof number of 60. Last time it got 56 yes votes, with seven Republicans backing it. More defections could be key, though the President would still veto the bill.

The story has an update from the New York Times which believes that Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) might be joining the group as well, and let's not overlook the fact that Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD) is now back in the Senate and voting, allowing Dems to inch closer to those 60 votes...

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Has McConnell Badly Botched The Larry Craig Matter? (UPDATED)

Now that U.S. Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID) appears to be fighting to keep his job, it's hard not to wonder whether Senate Minority Leader McConnell (R) has badly botched the handling of this matter by overcompensating for the gross mishandling of the Mark Foley mess in the House.

Today, Craig's legal team launched a PR offensive as well as seeking to have the Senate Ethics complaint -- filed against Craig by McConnell and his team -- dismissed, arguing that the matter involves a minor offense that does not relate to his official duties. It's hard to simply dismiss that argument and I agree with Josh Marshall's take on the issue:

So why is there an ethics investigation exactly? The answer seems clear, if on two levels. First, Craig's senate colleagues want to engineer a soft expulsion from the senate. That's obvious enough. And second, he was trolling for gay sex in a public restroom. And in the GOP catechism that's not just a felony but a capital offense.

When you consider how the ethics committee isn't worried about the growing problems concerning Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK), or Sen. David Vitter's (R-LA) admitted behavior, why are they going after Craig with such zeal and gusto?

I have little respect for Craig's hypocrisy over the years, given his own apparent preferences, but I am growing sympathetic towards him as the McConnell-led steamroller is moving with uncharacteristic lightning speed in trying to finish him off. I totally agree with McJoan over at DailyKos that should the guilty plea to the misdemeanor charge -- which Governor Fletcher (R) reminds us isn't any more serious than noodling -- be withdrawn by the judge, then what is there for the Senate Ethics committee to review at this time, other than the possibility that Craig is gay?

I love the fact that the Republicans are again finding themselves weighed-down by the scandal anchor, but the way McConnell has been handling the Craig matter has really rubbed me the wrong way. But more importantly, I think McConnell is killing his own caucus by botching this matter -- which now seems headed toward an intra-party collision with Craig staying and fighting -- at the worst possible time for Republicans: General Petraeus is days away from trying to save the GOP from the Iraq debacle.

UPDATE (5:26 PM): Apparently, McConnell has just flip-flopped on Craig, holding a press conference to announce Craig intends to stay in his Senate seat if he can get the charges dismissed. Amazing. So much for McConnell's earlier dismissal of any notion of a Craig return.

Courtesy of TPM Election Central:

Washington Post has a story.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

George: "Dear Sen. McConnell: Will You Help Us Stop The War?"

Stephen George, managing editor at LEO, wrote the following piece about last night's anti-war rally in Louisville and the accompanying march of 300 demonstrators from Bellarmine University (where the rally took place) to the home of U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell (R).

Stephen has permitted me to publish the entire piece along with photos that he took (click each photo for larger versions).

Dsc_0013 Dsc_0103 Dsc_0120

Dear Sen. McConnell: Will You Help Us Stop The War?
By Stephen George

The police have just told us to join the small group demonstrating on the other side of the street. It’s a balmy night in Louisville, and the crowd is menacing and concerted for a bunch of peaceniks, standing on a hill that is someone’s private yard about 20 yards and a two-lane neighborhood street from U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell’s doorstep. Rumor is he’s in the house, but no one will confirm that, especially not the mixed bag of police and Capitol security detail trying to stay composed in the face of a huge, loud protest.

Some on this side are incredulous that the group of 300 or so anti-war protesters — many holding yellow glow-sticks to illuminate uniform, blazing red “Support the Troops: End the War” placards — is about to share a five-foot-wide spit of concrete with the 30 or so McConnell supporters who were waiting when we arrived. It would seem, of course, that pushing the groups together would incite some kind of general violence, particularly given the aggressive nature of several McConnell supporters. Like all good Republican leg-humpers, they’ll gladly shove a video camera in your face and ask you questions like, “Why do you want to kill our soldiers?” and “Why do you hate America?” Those questions carry about as much meaning as a venereal disease.

As the group marched the quarter-of-a-mile from Bellarmine University — where the culminating event of Iraq Summer had just gone down before more than 700 supporters — some of McConnell’s henchmen drove aside us in a black SUV, deep tinted windows, filming. Hopefully we’ll end up in a campaign commercial!

Some of the amped-up Mitchheads seemed to be looking for a fight. An Iraq war veteran there to support the Senate Minority Leader promptly screamed epithets in the face of an older, gray-haired man — I was shocked when the white-knuckled patriot decided to walk away rather than beat him with a collapsible baton or, hell, his own highly trained fists. A thin boy in a red collared shirt tried in vain to explain to me and two others that there’s no way to end a war unless you win it, and that you cannot “support the troops” without supporting the war and McConnell’s program for “winning” it. Tell that to South Vietnam. The best comeback this kid could muster to the systematic challenges of his logic: “Well, obviously we disagree, and that’s OK, but you’re wrong.”

The profundity of this statement should not be overlooked.

The pinnacle of this night was not so much the somewhat less typical protest, although the booming chants echoing through the neighborhood — “Mitch, can you hear us? We are the people!” and “End this war!” — and the somber version of “We Shall Overcome” that closed the proceedings should send a message to any representative with a shred of dignity and decency toward his constituents. No, the real eye-opener was at Bellarmine in the early evening, where 677 guests plus several handfuls of volunteers and activists entertained the idea that the People can force change from their representatives, even the ones who’ve voted with President Bush’s failed war policy 15 times.

The event, part of a national web of similar happenings called “Take a Stand,” wrapped a 10-week campaign by a coalition of groups called Iraq Summer, which is a wing of the group Americans Against Escalation in Iraq. That group, which has targeted members of Congress in 15 states for obstructing policy shifts on the Iraq war, is an amalgam of members from MoveOn.org, True Majority, Working Assets, VoteVets.org, and a number of unions, along with other progressive groups.

Louisville’s outing was expected to be one of the largest, which is why Tom Matzzie, Washington director for MoveOn.org, decided to spend his night here. Also at the helm of Iraq Summer, Matzzie said he’s running this like a political campaign, and sparing no punches as he goes. His group is part of a newly forming coalition in Kentucky advancing a strong Ditch Mitch agenda — and the drumbeat in Louisville in particular seems to be getting louder.

“Kentucky’s progressive community is sick of Mitch McConnell obstructing an end to the war,” he told me. He also said the progressives here are among the more active in the country right now.

I mentioned that recently it seems McConnell may be starting to sidestep, at least in his rhetoric, his incessant war support. “If he’s got a proposal for how to force Bush to end the war, bring it forward,” Matzzie said. That’s about as likely as McConnell coming out of his house to greet the protesters, which could have been an outstanding chance to sit and talk, maybe whip up some tea, and get to the bottom of this whole Bush-doting thing he’s into.

Warming up the crowd between the most spontaneous standing ovations of the night, U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth said the Republicans he’s hearing from are expecting fallout over Iraq in the 2008 elections. “Republicans are scared to death,” he said, to rousing applause. “Let’s keep up the pressure.” Yarmuth, of course, has assailed the war since before troops were deployed.

Lt. Col. Andrew Horne, after losing to Yarmuth in last year’s Democratic primary, has kept a high profile in the anti-war movement. He told the crowd “we are battling for no less than this country’s soul.”

Watching this mass tonight, seeing an organized effort at nonviolent protest that didn’t seem like the self-caricature so many political protests have come to in the last few years, one might think Horne’s idea is resonating. As far as fervently political cities go, Louisville is more content than conflicted. But people here are angry about Iraq, and the best way they can find to tell McConnell about it — he turned down an invitation to the evening’s proceedings, probably a sensible, if highly political, move — is to stand in front of his house for two days and bark it at him.

Amy Shir, the former candidate for state representative, walked up to McConnell’s front door at one point during the protest and rang the bell. She was carrying a small American flag over her shoulder. There she stood for a second, frozen, looking surprised cops hadn’t tackled her yet. Not everyone caught it. Of course, within 30 seconds Metro police and the small Capitol force dashed to the porch, flashlights drawn, ready to take Shir down for fucking with the wrong guy. It was right after Shir and I played catch-up next to the flashing lights of a police cruiser blocking the road.

“We need more fearless people,” she explained. “What’s the way to be fearless? Show up. Use your voice. What’s the risk?”

As far as I could tell, Shir wasn’t arrested. But I didn’t see her again.

Stephen George is managing editor of the Louisville Eccentric Observer (LEO). Contact him at sgeorge@leoweekly.com

For more about last night, Jim Pence over at Hillbilly Report has video and Joe Sonka at DitchMitch live-blogged the event as well.

Monday, August 20, 2007

Help A Local Democrat Win The "Roadblock Republican" Contest, Exposing Senator McConnell's (R) Iraq Obstructionism

I've learned that Bowling Green Democratic activist, Claudia Hanes, has made the finals of the “The Roadblock Republicans Radio Spot” contest. In her spot, Claudia, a mother of a soldier, takes on Senator McConnell (R) over his stubborn backing of President Bush's failed policies in Iraq.

The winning radio spot will be aired in states that have “Roadblock Republican” members of Congress. Thousands of people entered spots, and the field has been narrowed down to only 20 nationwide finalists. 

Please visit the website and vote for Claudia’s radio spot, so that her ad will be run throughout Kentucky, exposing McConnell's stubborn obstructionism over Iraq. I just did. 

She is identified as #5, Claudia H., Bowling Green, Kentucky.   

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Did Senator McConnell Lie To Us About General Petraeus' September "Report" To Congress

Yesterday, the White House unimaginably acknowledged that the much-touted report that General Petraeus is scheduled to give to Congress in September on progress in Iraq is actually going to be written by the White House -- not Petraeus. This is just mind-blowing stuff since for the past three months, President Bush responded to the constant flow of terrible news coming from Iraq by telling us not to jump to conclusions until we hear from the commanders in the field. Incredibly, all this was a ploy as the September report will be the White House's version of how things are going in Iraq, not the commanding general.

But what's even more disturbing is that Senate Minority Leader McConnell (R) either has no idea what the White House is doing or he's deliberately lying to the public on this issue.

The following is a press release that McConnell put out less than a month ago, chastising Democrats for rushing to judgment before Petraeus can give us his report in September:

McConnell: ‘It's Time to Put an End to This Charade’
From the Office of Senator Mitch McConnell
Wednesday, July 18, 2007

“The conference report that 80 senators voted for in May required a benchmarks report in July and a report from General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker in September. We chose July for the benchmarks report because the Baghdad Security Plan would be fully manned and we wanted the Iraqi government to know we expected their cooperation and sacrifice in exchange for ours.

“We chose September because that's when General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker planned to give the President an update on the counterinsurgency plan currently underway. We thought it reasonable that we get the same assessment to form an appropriate legislative response. The Congress decided in May that one month of a fully manned surge was insufficient to call the Petraeus Plan a failure. We wrote that decision into law.

“Since May, we've learned that progress is mixed. Many of the military tasks assigned have been achieved, but we've not seen sufficient progress on the political benchmarks. Some of our colleagues have refrained from calling for a change in strategy until they hear what General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker have to say in September.

“Ambassador Crocker and General Petraeus deserve an opportunity to be heard when these significant reports come out in September.

Update (9:28 am): Also, here's what Senator Bunning (R) bellowed from the Senate Floor last month:

Some of our colleagues believe they know the situation on the ground in Iraq better than my friend General Petraeus, the commander of the multinational forces in Iraq .

They believe we should begin a withdrawal of our troops from Iraq .

The people who are best qualified to decide our troop levels are the commanders on the ground, not politicians in Washington.

[...]

But stay strong until September when General Petraeus briefs us on the effects of the surge. Then lets all reevaluate.

[...]

We promised to give him until September to report back with the progress on the surge and we should hold true to this promise.

Will our media press our senators on these incredible developments on the most important issue of our time, or will they allow them to weasel out?

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Who's The Real Journalist?

What does say when a comedian does such a better job of asking the pertinent questions -- and follow-ups to non-responsive and evasive answers -- about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan than pretty much any member of the national media during the past six years? Seriously, the national media has been shameful and derelict in its duties since we invaded Iraq. It really saddens me.

Click here to see what I'm talking about.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Bush Moves Goal Posts Regarding Progress In Iraq, Once Again

What a surprise...President Bush (R) is moving the goal posts once again on when we should expect to see progress in Iraq:

A September progress report on the U.S. troop increase in Iraq that President George W. Bush called an important moment for his war strategy is unlikely to be a "pivotal" assessment, officials now say.

[...]

Bush, in an interview with Reuters last month, said September would be an "important moment" to assess the extent of progress under the troop buildup he ordered in January.

"I see it as an important moment, because (Gen.) David Petraeus (the top U.S. commander in Iraq) says that's when he'll have a pretty good assessment as to what the effects of the surge has been," he said.

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Evans/Novak: Negative Feedback From Top Military Commanders On Iraq Surge

The just-released Evans & Novak Political Report has this downbeat assessment of the Iraq surge:

The troop surge in Iraq is getting mixed results, but so far most of the feedback is negative.

1. The heightened U.S. troop presence, according to the top commanders, appears to be pushing the violence out of certain areas, but it has increased in others. Meanwhile, U.S. troop deaths are skyrocketing, with very little attention being paid to this fact at home. The first quarter of 2007 saw 244 deaths, far more than the same period last year. On April 10, the Pentagon reported 35 troop deaths in the first 10 days of this month. The grand total is approaching 3,300.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon has just announced a new policy that extends active-duty Iraq deployments from 12 months to 15 months.

Friday, April 06, 2007

Yarmuth Blasts McCain

U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth (D) calls out Senator John McCain (R-Ariz) on his ludicrous statements of late asserting that there are neighborhoods in Baghdad where Americans can safely walk the streets:

“I think that was as self-destructive a statement as you can make politically, because it’s so patently absurd on its face,” Yarmuth said. “He loses all credibility to talk about the subject now.”

Indeed.

Monday, April 02, 2007

Don't You Hate It When Reality Interferes With A Good Talking Point?

Wake-up, Senator McCain:

Snipers Back At Baghdad Market After McCain Visit
By Mussab Al-Khairalla  |  April 2, 2007

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The crack of shots fired by unseen snipers echoed on Monday through Baghdad's wholesale Shorja market, a day after U.S. Senator John McCain held up his visit there as one sign of improving security in Baghdad.

(Hat tip, Daily Kos)

Why It's Hard To Take The Wing-Nuts Seriously

The wing-nuts were out in full force this weekend blasting Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's (D) upcoming visit to Syria over the objections of the White House. Turns out that Pelosi believes we should actually heed the recommendations of the bi-partisan Iraq Study Group and engage Iraq's neighbors.

Some of the less credible wingnut bloggers are even calling for Pelosi's impeachment because of her visit, during their incoherent tantrums.

Interestingly, I failed to notice any criticism about this item:

Syrian President Bashar Assad held talks Sunday with three members of the US House of Representatives in a review of US-Syrian relations, regional developments and the stalled Mideast peace process.

Representatives Frank Wolf (Republican, Virginia), Joe Pitts (Republican, Pennsylvania) and Robert Aderholt (Republican, Alabama) had arrived in Damascus on Saturday on a two-day visit.

Turns out that there's a bi-partisan effort here to engage Syria's president, but I guess that doesn't fit their talking points. This whole "co-equal branch of government" thingee is a little elusive for our extremists friends who still yearn for the days of a Congress that did whatever Bush, Cheney & Rove, Inc. told them, the Constitution be damned...

(P.S. - Oh yeah, these same nuts are also lecturing us for not admitting how well the surge is working. See below for the recent update on the surge.)

I Thought The Surge Was Working?

I guess all that propaganda about the surge really working was just, well, more Bush Administration propaganda:

Iraq Death Toll Jumps 15 Percent In March

BAGHDAD (AFP) - At least 2,078 people died in Iraq last month, 15 percent more than in February despite a massive security crackdown in Baghdad, the epicentre of violence, a security official said on Sunday.

On average, 67 people died across the country every day in March, compared to 64 in February.

[...]

In March, 165 Iraqi policemen were killed against 131 the previous month, while 44 Iraqi soldiers died compared to 29 in February, the official said.

In March, 277 Iraqi policemen and 51 soldiers were wounded against 147 and 47, respectively during February.

The official said the death toll among militants had fallen to 481 in March compared to 586 killed the previous month.

Also, you probably read all the ridicule that U.S. Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) received last week when he asserted that things had gotten so much better of late that there were now neighborhoods in Iraq where Americans could safely walk the streets.

Well, looks like Senator McCain put that to the test this weekend during his own trip to Iraq and spent an hour walking the streets. Turns out he was indeed safe, probably no little thanks to this addition to his delegation:

...McCain's "stroll" today through a Baghdad market was guarded by 100 American soldiers, three Blackhawk helicopters, and two Apache gunships.

In his Dukakis-in-a-tank moment, McCain himself wore a bulletproof vest on his stroll.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Anti-War Ad Targets Senate GOP Leader (AP)

Just hitting the AP wire:

A liberal group advocating the withdrawal of troops from Iraq will begin airing an ad Wednesday in Kentucky that criticizes Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell for supporting President Bush's war policies.

The $200,000 ad by Americans United for Change will hit the airwaves the day after the Senate sent a signal that it wants combat troops out of Iraq by next March.

McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, helped lead an attempt to remove that nonbinding deadline from a war-spending bill. That effort failed Tuesday, 50-48.

The ad juxtaposes clips of McConnell offering optimistic assessments about the war with scenes of chaos in Iraq.

"Tell Mitch McConnell: Stop blocking change in Iraq," the ad concludes.

McConnel has argued that deadlines for withdrawal of troops will embolden terrorists and insurgents in Iraq.

The ad, which will run through next week's Easter congressional recess, is part of a broader campaign by Americans United for Change to brand McConnell as an obstacle to the Democratic Party agenda.

UPDATE (8:25 pm): Here's the ad:

US Senate Votes 50-48 To Keep Iraq Withdrawal Timeline In War Funding Bill

By a 50-48 vote, the U.S. Senate has just voted to keep Iraq withdrawal timeline language in the supplemental appropriations bill, joining the U.S. House which passed it last week. The vote was on Sen. Thad Cochran's (R-MS) amendment to strip the bill of the language, which failed.

UPDATE: Kos offers his take.

Monday, March 26, 2007

McConnell Sees Iraq Troop Withdrawal Passing Senate

Quite a change of tone from Senate Minority Leader McConnell (R).

From Reuters:

President George W. Bush is likely to lose a first-round fight with Democrats over a critical funding bill that sets a date for American troops to withdraw from Iraq, the U.S. Senate's Republican leader said on Monday.

Mitch McConnell of Kentucky predicted legislation similar to that already passed by the House of Representatives would eventually get through the Senate, which is more narrowly controlled by Democrats.

"The final bill is likely to have the offending language in it," the Senate minority leader said as the Senate prepared to begin debating the war-funding bill that sets March 31, 2008 as a goal for removing combat soldiers from Iraq.

At that point, he said Bush would have to veto the legislation and lawmakers would have to get to work again. Democrats do not appear to have enough votes to overturn a veto, which requires a two-thirds majority.

Friday, March 23, 2007

By 218-212 Vote, House Passes Iraq Spending Measure With Withdrawal Timetable

Conservatives were predicting last night that today's vote on Iraq War spending which contained a specific timetable for withdrawal would lose by 20 votes...It just passed 218 to 212.

While it's unlikely that President Bush will ever sign the measure (even if a version passed the Senate), it's a great sign of progress that we're having a real debate on the matter and legislation is actually being passed in the House. Things are heading in the right direction, even if belatedly.

UPDATE: Two Republicans joined 216 Democrats in passing the bill. 14 Democrats voted against the bill, though both Reps. Ben Chandler (D) and John Yarmuth (D) voted for passage...

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Veterans and U.S. Rep. Ben Chandler (D)

In light of the recent revelations about the deplorable conditions at Walter Reed Army Hospital and at countless VA hospitals across the country, I wanted to give credit to U.S. Rep. Ben Chandler (D), who during his 2004 congressional special election made veterans' health care his top issue, and an issue that remains dear to him and his staff. Ben was ahead of the curve in fully understanding how health care for our veterans had become another social issue with plenty of mandates, most of them unfunded or underfunded, and one which we had a moral obligation to fulfill.

During that race, Ben often warned that if we weren't living up to our VA obligations in early 2004, how could we possibly care for the wounded troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan over the long-term? At that time, American troops had suffered only 10% of the total wounded so far in the war.

With the front-page stories, congressional hearings and blue ribbon commission now underway, I was thinking about how Ben's concerns have sadly played out.

Friday, March 02, 2007

CBS/NYT Poll: Bush Appoval Rating Drops To 29%; Handling Of Foriegn Policy To All-Time Low 25%

In anticipation of President Bush's (R) big Louisville fundraiser this evening for Senate Minority Leader McConnell (R), the latest CBS News/New York Times poll has bad news for the administration.

CBS News/New York Times Poll. Feb. 23-27, 2007. N=1,281 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3% (2/8-11  results)

Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as President?

Approve 29 (32) (second-lowest ever)
Disapprove 61 (59)

Do you feel things in this country are generally going in the right direction or do you feel things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?

Right 23 (26) (ties all-time low)
Wrong 68 (68)

Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling foreign policy?

Approve 25 (28) (all-time low)
Disapprove 66 (61)

Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling the situation with Iraq?

Approve 23 (27) (second-lowest ever)
Disapprove 71 (68)

Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling the campaign against terrorism?

Approve 40 (44) (all-time low)
Disapprove 53 (49)

Monday, February 26, 2007

Gore's Oscar Fuels Call for Late Run

Hopefully, this will get get louder and louder. I sure would love to see it:

Former Vice President Al Gore's triumph at the Oscars is already stoking activists’ pleas for him to make a dramatic late entry into the fractious presidential race, and some key strategists insist he could announce as late as September or October and still win the nomination.

“Honestly, this was the inaugural parade we all envisioned,” said Donna Brazile, his former campaign manager. “Gore's political stock is hot right now. I don’t know if I would cash in now with so many players still on stage. There’s no reason to force him to declare tomorrow. ”

[...]

“He could come in at the end of the day as a candidate who can truly unite his party as well as his country,” Brazile said. “He can help repair our country’s image abroad. He’s someone who can go toe-to-toe with world leaders and doesn’t need a crash course in diplomacy.” She remembers back in the ’80s when Gore was in Congress and used to often cite a quote from Gandhi, ““Be the change you want to see in the world.” Brazile said: “I believe he has become that quote.”

And we're going to see more of Gore in the coming months:

The former vice president will be in the spotlight again with three major events in the next five months:

--On March 21, he’ll star at global-warming hearings in both the House and Senate, testifying before a committee he once served on. He will be the sole witness before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. On the House side, he will testify at a Joint Subcommittee Hearing on Climate Change, held by the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality, and the Science and Technology Subcommittee on Energy and Environment.

--A new book by Gore, "The Assault on Reason: How the Politics of Fear, Secrecy, and Blind Faith Subvert Wise Decision Making, Degrade Our Democracy, and Put Our Country and Our World in Peril," is due out in May.

--On July 7 (7.7.07), he will be among the luminaries heading a 24-hour “Save Our Selves” (SOS) concert marathon across all seven continents. The “Live Earth” concert will bring together more than 100 of the world’s top musical acts and is designed to reach more than 2 billion people through attendance and broadcasts.

And don't forget that Gore has been formally nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize (which is usually announced in October) and he has to be considered a strong contender. Imagine that:

"[Gore] has been nominated for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize by Norwegian lawmakers who seek to recognize the former American vice president's wide-reaching efforts to alert the world to the dangers of global warming. "A prerequisite for winning the Nobel Peace Prize is making a difference, and Al Gore has made a difference," explains Boerge Brende, a conservative former minister of environment and then of trade who joined with Heidi Soerensen, a prominent leftist, to nominate Gore.

Sadly, the guy who lost the presidency has done a much better job of leading the free world than the guy who won. Be it climate change, his passionate defense of the Bill of Rights more than a year ago at Constitutional Hall, his opposition to the war in Iraq, and his speaking out against torture, Gore has led. He's not let polls and focus groups dictate what he said or when he said it. I hope the calls for him to run in 2008 get louder and that Gore heeds those pleas.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Libby Trial -- Closing Arguments

Closing arguments are going on as I write this in the federal perjury trial of Scooter Libby. Based on the various media accounts of the testimony, things don't look good for Libby.

But beyond the fate of Libby, momentum seems to be gathering for the investigation to examine Vice President Cheney's role in the leak case. Murray Waas, who's done fine reporting in this case, wrote a piece in yesterday's National Journal about this very subject that is definitely worth a read. Among the things that stood out was this:

If Libby is found guilty, investigators are likely to probe further to determine if Libby devised what they consider a cover story in an effort to shield Cheney. They want to know whether Cheney might have known about the leaks ahead of time or had even encouraged Libby to provide information to reporters about Plame's CIA status, the same sources said.

Finally, Firedoglake has been living blogging the entire from the courtroom and they've just posted the prosecution's closing arguments (part 1, part 2) as well as the first part of the defense's closing, if you're interested in something not yet spun by the mainstream media.

Here's how the prosecution began it's closing (this is a rough-cut of what was said, not a transcript):

On behalf of defense, Wells elected to give opening. He painted different picture, told you about WH conspiracy to scapegoat Libby. Effort to make LIbby into sacrificial lamb so that Karl Rove would go free. You've heard witnesses testify, you've heard witness after witness, you've heard them testify about one or another conversation with Libby about Valerie Wilson during the time period that Libby claimed he had no memory of Wilson's wife. You heard Russert testify, take an oath and say he never spoke to Libby about Wilson's wife. In direct contrast to what Libby claimed. Now did you hear any evidence about a conspiracy to scapegoat Libby? If you draw a blank, it's not because of a problem with your evidence. I bring that to your attention to remind you that evidence is what happened on witness stand and introduced as evidence. Unfulfilled promises from counsel do no constitute evidence. Fitz told you this is case about lying, and I submit that is right. Not a case about bad memory or forgetting. Libby does claim he forgot 9 separate conversations over a 4 week period, but he also invents out of whole cloth, two conversations that never happened. His conversation with Cooper and his conversation with Russert. That's not a matter of forgetting or misremembering, it's lying.

Friday, February 16, 2007

USA Today Publisher Names Bush As Worst President Ever

Today, Al Neuharth, publisher of USA Today, called President Bush (R) the worst president in American history, reversing himself from an article a year ago when it chastised Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) for making such a statement:

A year ago I criticized Hillary Clinton for saying "this (Bush) administration will go down in history as one of the worst."

"She's wrong," I wrote. Then I rated these five presidents, in this order, as the worst: Andrew Jackson, James Buchanan, Ulysses Grant, Hoover and Richard Nixon. "It's very unlikely Bush can crack that list," I added.

I was wrong. This is my mea culpa. Not only has Bush cracked that list, but he is planted firmly at the top.

...and then there's our own Senate Minority Leader McConnell (R) who last year proclaimed:

Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell of Kentucky called Bush "one of the great presidents in the history of the United States."

Of course, McConnell also boasted:

  • Senator Mitch McConnell called Rumsfeld “a spectacular secretary of defense, one of the best in American history." (link)
                    
  • Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said the war in Iraq has been an "extremely successful undertaking." (link)

Wingnuts Resort To Fabricating Abraham Lincoln Quotes To Defend Iraq War Stance

How much longer before U.S. Rep. Geoff Davis (R) follows his colleague's lead and offers us a fabricated Abraham Lincoln quote to defend his certifiably yahoo position on the Iraq War?

House Passes Resolution Expressing Disapproval For Iraq Escalation

By a 246-182 vote, the U.S. House this afternoon rebuked President Bush (R) over his Iraq escalation with 17 Republican members crossing party lines to support the resolution while 2 Democrats voted no.

Again showing themselves completely out-of-touch with Kentucky voters, all four Republican congressmen voted against the resolution while Reps. Ben Chandler (D) and John Yarmuth (D) backed the resolution.

The actual text of the resolution read:

Disapproving of the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That--

(1) Congress and the American people will continue to support and protect the members of the United States Armed Forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq; and

(2) Congress disapproves of the decision of President George W. Bush announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Apparently, Rep. Geoff Davis (R) Knows Better Than Top American Military Leadership...

Apparently, U.S. Rep. Geoff Davis (R) is smarter than Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Peter Pace when it comes to knowing our troops.

Davis, today:

"This nonbinding resolution serves no purpose other than pacifying the Democrats' political base and lowering morale in our military."

Gates and Pace, last week:

<